Gravitas: Supreme court faces backlash over Nupur Sharma's plea

She didn't insult , she just told something written in Arabic to English or Hindi .

“She is single handedly responsible”, did these so called judges really go to law school or Sharia school? Nupur was just responding to an insulting statement.

Ma’am.. correction -Ms Sharma did not insult Mohammad.. she cited the Hadith in response to insults inflicted on the Hindu deities by a fellow panelists Rehamani.. why is Rehamani not been pulled up by any one

"The Tailor should not have thrown his neck on the innocent customers Knives."- SC

I never understood what was wrong she said ??? She only quoted the holy hadith and if the hadith is blasphemous to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), then Islamic clerics should edit it instead of blaming and threatening others.

0:45 She didn't insult anyone. Period!

When someone says "What nupur Sharma said was unacceptable" and she told what is written in the Quran. Then calling her words as unacceptable = Calling the Quran unacceptable.

No one said anything to condemn the Rehmani person whose own words were 'unacceptable'. Would you, Palki?

I stand by Nupur Sharma and I did not like the observation of SC judges and I feel that it was rationally, morally and logically wrong observation made by judges of SC...

Nupur Sharma did nothing wrong. She only retorted to the questions posed to her religious beliefs. She did this by exercising the freedom of speech which is in fact protected by the same supreme court. The supreme court judge made a very partial and politically motivated comment and should be reprimanded to the fullest extent, if not terminated. I stand with Nupur Sharma in solidarity.

Palki Sharma should always mention that the comments Nupur made were after the provocation by Muslim clerics about the Hindu Gods. Even if this news was for a different issue facts should be mentioned as they happened. The narrative should be set based on truth.

She wasn't lying! Why is she going through this? What is wrong with people nowadays?

She spoke what is written in the book

"Abusing Kaali Mata is Freedom of speech" - Sheikh-ularism

When you say "What Nupur Sharma said was unacceptable" but do not point out the provocation, you are doing the same. Criticizing only one party and not other is grave injustice. Not expected from Palki Sharma and Wion.

Nupur Sharma did not insult, she only quoted from the holy book as it is. Please correct yourself Palki.

Its good to see that former judges, civil servants and veterans are coming out against this type of judicial activism. The judiciary has a specific task and it must stick to that very specific task only: interpreting the law and making judgements in line with that law based on facts. Those remarks were not only unnecessary but completely unbecoming of any judge, let alone a judge of the Supreme Court. The said judge must be reprimanded because he has allowed his personal biases to malign this judgement. This must be declared a mistrial and her plea must be heard again.

Supreme Joke of India 👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️: Nupur Sharma's words are single handedly responsible for 5cr pending cases and 29% vacancy in courts 🥴🥴

How did those two sick-in-the-head judges become Supreme Court judges in the first place?

Few clarification : Firstly, Nupur Sharma said nothing wrong. It was a retaliation to the other panel in the debate who were insulting Hindu gods yet nobody talks about he said. Secondly, Nupur simply pointed the fact that their so-called prophet at aged 55 married a 6 yrs old kid and sleep with her when she turn 9yrs. This is a fact which is written in their Hadith. (it seems muslims are ashamed of this so they take it as an insult). And lastly, This "peaceful religion" is the problem for the whole world. The desert cult has nothing but hatred for the world specially people of different faith. Read their "holy book" and see what is written. You will be shock.