Scientists Warn James Webb Telescope New Image Shows Something Seriously Wrong with our Universe...

Another excellent and well presented video. Thank-you. I proposed many years ago that telescopes cannot look-back in time because time is a man made concept. Time is also relative to the observer, not distant bodies in motion. in fact when an observer measures a distant body in motion time changes to appear relative to the observer producing according to Einstein's special relativity time dilation and length contraction. We see the rapid moving distant galaxies receding away from us as they look in the here and now because light travels at c and the galaxies are moving away from us faster than light. So these relativistic effects occur to the light information. We see the distant bodies in rapid motion as they look today, not how they looked in the past. Quantum field theory calls this effect quantum entanglement of light. The theory proposed that it's due to all the potential light particles measured in our time to be quantumly connected because they're all within the EM field of the distant galaxy or star. Thus the light information happens instantly when an observer looks. So if say one light particle were manipulated at a light distance of 14 billion light years away the observer if it was able to look that far would measure the distant galaxy as it looks today, not how it looked in the past. Well, that was my interpretation when I studied the theories and laws of physics back in 2004. I tried to tell NASA employees that telescopes can't be used to look back in time because of these relativistic effects occurring when an observer looks. In this case the telescope is the observer, so the distant galaxies will look as if they are already 14 billion years old when looking at a distance of 14 billion light years away. They will not look like they are newly formed small dim galaxies made of young population 3 stars. The galaxies will be old, massive, bright and would contain old red giant stars. NASA employees in 2010 argued with me, called me many things that I shall not repeat. They turned me away from communicating with them any further. I didn't feel an urge to continue feeding their cognitive dissonance. Then I died in my sleep. I had a blood clot the size of an earthworm lodged in the vein going to my heart. My heart stopped working before midnight 07-23-2021. On the other side I heard a voice tell me I had to go back and publish my work into books before the James Webb was launched because I was right about everything. Then I awoke in the hospital with tubes down my nose and throat 3 days later on the 26th. I starting writing my books about a week later when I got home. I finally published my first book SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY by Ron Kemp about 2 months later on 09-27-2021, 3 months before the James Webb was launched. I met my deadline with months to spare. On page 48 I wrote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I then went on to explain using quantum field theory, special relativity, the speed of light, observer effect, and James Maxwell's equations on light how I came to that wild conclusion. Then I had to wait for the data to come back. In July of 2022, almost a year after my infarction astronomers confirmed I was correct. The telescope found old, fully grown galaxies as far as it was able to see, some were even larger than our galaxy but further than a light distance of 13.8 billion light-years away. Just as I predicted. Telescopes cannot look-back in time because of the relativistic effects occurring to light information when an observer looks at a distant object moving at or near the speed of light. Time is then measured relative to the observer, not the distant galaxy. Meaning the galaxies measured by an outside observer (telescope) will be old, massive and bright. Not young, small and dim. I was right all along and all I got was flack from NASA employees. LOL, and now they want people to believe telescopes are looking back in time and that there's something wrong with the universe instead of admitting Einstein's theory of gravity and the speed of light according to quantum entanglement is wrong, telescopes can't see into the past like they're a time machine. Penrose proposed a CCC conformal "con" cosmological cyclical universe, CCC? Another theory that can't be proven like the big bang, dark matter, dark energy, and other theories. Some scientists believe in an older universe, saying a big bang might have happened 26.7 billion years ago and not 13.8 billion years ago, pushing the big bang back almost 13 billion years. Some scientists believe in tired light, thinking that the light loses energy the further it travels. But that wouldn't explain why the galaxies are larger than ours. If the light lost energy then the light would not be detected at all. It would have dissipated before reaching the telescope. If the tired light somehow did make it to the telescope the galaxies should appear younger, smaller and dimmer not older larger and brighter. Some scientists think the constants of nature changed over time, that they were different in the early universe. That can't be confirmed either. Some scientists think the standard model is wrong on how fast stars and black holes grow, the Eddington Limit, which up until now was confirmed over and over again with the observation of galaxies at a distance of about 93 megaparsecs away. I proposed back in 2004 that general relativity is mistaken about look-back time because of the relativistic effects that occur to bodies moving FTL from our rest frame of reference. Sure enough, I was spot on. Telescopes cannot look into the past no more than a microscope can look into the future. Light information happens in a quantum instant when the telescope is contained inside the EM field of light it's measuring.

There are several things that annoy me about this video. First and foremost, the universe is NOT broken or flawed. The universe simply exists. Our perceptions and theories can be wrong, but it is logically impossible to say that the universe is flawed. Then, a few seconds into the video you displayed a picture of an F-18 which is most decidedly not a "stealth" fighter. Had you displayed an F-22, that would have served your purposes much better because the F-22 is indeed a stealthy airframe, ie hard to detect with radar. You see, the first step to solving a problem is the accurate identification of its parts. Any other approach is just so much folly.

I see and hear many discussions about "dark matter" which was discovered by an astronomer named Fritz Zwicky. He calculated the motions of the galaxies, galaxies were just recently discovered, and realized that they lacked the mass to move the way they were moving. This brought up the problem of missing mass. We made the blithe assumption that Einstein's theory is absolutely correct and therefore started talking about this alleged missing mass and called it "dark matter." Dark matter may or may not exist, which is never mentioned here of late.

I’m glad we have people worrying for us

The science community could stand to make some changes in what they pursue

Someone quickly fix the universe to make it fit our theories and calm this guy down

I always thought that dark matter and energy was the biggest scam after the geocentrism. I might be right after all.

I am quite sure are not worried in the slightest or indeed any of your viewers, The universe, the Cosmos has Its own momentem and we are lucky to see some of Its magnificence.

I always thought that our Universe would be really BIG & I was therefore surprised that when JWST data showed up there was a big surprise announcement. Really? Seems to me the ‘new’ mirror was way 2 small a change to make much of a difference. If the new aperture was 10 times bigger that might show significant improvement in resolution. If we are serious in expanding our capabilities 10 times larger would be THE MINIMUM improvement to consider. During WW2, improvements were only considered if they really would make a difference.

It seems the Big Bang theory is incorrect because we can now see other galaxies beyond the edge of our own galaxy. Also, it seems that there is no edge to infinity which would indicate there wasn't a beginning nor is there an end. Otherwise in our quest to measure and attach numbers to everything is going to change a great deal and hasn't been correct from the start of this effort quantify everything.

When we get to see further, the truth becomes apparent!

Awesome!

There was a big 'suck' before the big bang. The 'Nelsone'. From the 'first' Bill Nelson (Desiree Dubanette), nasa scientist. Not the replacement Bill Nelson you see now

LMAO. Regardless! What happens. I am good. With it... Loving life. Like heaven on Earth. Lol

They really can't estimate nothing. Just like they've been estimating all along. The more you know. The more you learn. It a endless process. Still LMAO!....

Were are the new images ? All I can see is your bloody animations !!! Why don´t you show those new images ? I want to see them !

I am 'ATM" a 60y ol bright & shining star. after mi death. I will be an imploding Dark energy, surfing with the Alien's.

man cannot built a perpetual motion machine,,,but the UNIVERSE can and did ,just think about our planetary system,lol :face-blue-wide-eyes::eyes-pink-heart-shape:😊

།ཐོག་མཐའ་མེད་པའི་ཁྱེད་རང་གི་བློ་ཡོ་བ་འཁྲུལ་གཞི་ཡིན་པས་། 😂

Who died and made you God? Why do you insist that the entire universe MUST have a beginning? Why is the answer to the question of when did existence begin so necessary? That is like believing that life could not have possibly began on Earth and that the source of it must be found on another planet. Look at how unique Earth is in the solar system and you have your answer right there. Life originated on Earth simply because the conditions were favorable. There is no need to look elsewhere. How does knowing when and how existence began do us any good? In my opinion, that is all but useless. What we have is a universe that is so large that it is difficult to measure and that is, as far as I concerned, more than enough to worry with.