Labyrinth Chess

can't imagine this with fog of war

If you ever get the feeling you're useless just think about the rooks in this gamemode

Trading doesn't make sense in 4 person chess because then you are both colluding to be at a disadvantage. A short term point gain is not worth loss in material when an excess in material can be converted into points later. If trading ever did make sense you can always do it later, and keep your material for most of the game.

Idea: Demotion Chess: Instead of a piece dying when it gets taken by another piece, the piece is demoted (king,queen,rook,bishop,knight,pawn) and the other piece stays at the same spot. Shorter Games: Same rules as above except when a knight gets captured by a non pawn piece, it dies. When it does get captured by a pawn, it turns to a pawn When a bishop gets captured by a non knight piece, it dies, but when it gets captured by a knight, it gets demoted to a pawn, and when pawn captures it, it gets turned to a knight. When a rook gets captured by a non bishop piece, it dies, when captured by bishop, it turns to pawn, when captured by knight, it turns to knight, and when captured by pawn, it turns to rook. When a queen gets captured by queen, it dies. when captured by rook, it turns to pawn. when captured by bishop, it turns to knight. when captured by knight, it turns to bishop, and finally, when captured by pawn, it turns to rook. Edit - Shorter games is completely different, and if you cant read it, i realized i can simple it down: Queens are 5 points, rooks are 4, bishops 3, knights 2, and pawns one. When a piece captures it, it gets downgraded by that point value (BxR=P) Also, the king is the only piece that has to be downgraded fully. When its captured, no matter what piece it is, it gets downgraded by only one point (it stays as a king though.)

This is A-Maze-ing

He talks about me at 4:20 What are the odds

I'm annoyed at myself for not saving the mate from black

I WORKED HARD FOR THIS WIN