Does the CRYING CHILD possess the plush?

Father please, don't turn me into a marketable plushie

No matter what, crying child will always possess a place in our hearts Rip Evagarretbitechild Afton

I've always seen CC not being able to see being due to the fact that Fredbear crushed a good amount of his head, eyes included (or maybe in the surgery that tried to save him he had to get his eyes removed), but the idea of him just being a walkie-talkie is on the same level of amusing as the idea of phone guy possessing the FNaF1's phone and I'm so in for it XD

This is very good video. If we take what we know about FNaF possessions, the two contenders that fit the criteria the best is Fredbear plush and the Fredbear animatronic. Shatter victim seems more like an explanation from convenience rather than based from something based within the universe.

you ever hear that one theory that has both plushvictim and golden duo by saying the possessed fredbear plush containing bv was put inside the fredbear suit, the same way how the ella doll that contains charlies memory or whatever was put inside the charlie bots to give them life

Personally I figured bite victim moved on after the fire in fnaf 3 since he never showed up anywhere in fnaf 6

I'd always assumed that since he died from being crushed by fredbear's jaws, he could've possessed it. Either by virtue of it being the cause of death or being injured so badly that death was inevitable. In essence, he "died" the moment the mouth shut and crushed him.

CC is definitely a lingering spirt related to Fredbear/Golden Freddy

YES it's here! ✨ PlushVictim!!!

I just wanted to point out that there is a real-world plushy of the Psychic Friend Fredbear Plush that is labeled as possessed. You could argue it's a toy, so it doesn't couldn't. However, they could have named it anything yet they went with possessed. Personally, as soon as I heard the theory from GiBi, I believed it because I always had a problem with CC possessing Fredbear despite not dying near it.

The bite victim is a literal Achilles heel when it comes to theorizing that people will tear to shreds. People response examples I see often. Bite victim motive: this guy is imply willgrief get em!! Bite victim receiver: reading comprehension much? Its like if your not conforming to a theory your just gonna be attacked for trying to involve bite victim in anyway that goes against the consensus. I personally still believe he’s the receiver as he’s the only one we specifically know game wise had a birthday and if happiest day is about happy memories releasing the spirits then he’s the perfect fit other then still needing a connection to the MCI and why they can only move on when he does. But again people will say it’s wrong and say Cassidy has to be the receiver cause the puppet is handing her cake (justified and no way to argue that)

Not sure if it was intentional but this thumbnail really stands out from your others and it looks great

Y'know as a ShatterVictimer, I can confirm that BV's connection with the MCI is always the #1 problem when it comes to this theory. The only real reason as to why I even believe it is because it sorta gives him a significance as Molten Freddy just like you said. Anyways, this was a fun video! The idea of BV becoming the thing that kept him company before his death is honestly kinda heartwarming. It might not be the best, but this is the only theory you get without the "distance" issue if you don't like FollowVictim.

My current idea is that BV possesses the Fredbear Plush and William takes it to his underground facility. When he begins his remnant experiments, he realizes that there's a possibility his son is in the plush, so he starts experimenting with the remnant within his plush. Since remnant is heavily tied to memory, this causes his memory to become shattered, his remnant split across various objects William used for his remnant experiments, including the MCI animatronics. This is how BV's memories become attached to the MCI kids for ShatterVictim to work. Another idea I toyed with is that BV's remnant is put in the remnant reservoir of the Scooper and that his remnant was directly injected into Mike, BV attaching himself to Mike which would explain why Mike is still alive, BV kept him alive, similar to how Andrew kept William alive in the novels. This could also explain the FNAF 4 Nightmares, BV's memories and maybe even his agony is attached to Mike, causing him to experience the nightmares that mix the experiments with FNAF 1 and the Bite of '83 into one big nightmare until the Logbook happens and BV recovers more of his memories with the help of Cassidy.

That zombie gargle "byyyyyee" at the end scared the shit out of me

I can't be the only one who thinks the FNAF 4 story is really sad. That kid is bullied to the point that it kills him, and he dies alone with nothing but his imaginary friends and (unknowingly to him) his dad speaking from a walkie-talkie in his favorite plushie. And then he doesn't even get to rest and is trapped in a dark void for who knows how long.

I honestly think Molten Freddy's "One big happy family" line has to do with how the Afton family is together again in Pizza Sim. However, I also think that if you look at the Funtimes, you realize each one is modelled on a member of the Afton Family. William built animatronics to represent his family. Ballora for his wife, Baby for his daughter, Funtime Foxy for Mike, and Funtime Freddy for CC (with BonBon being Psychic Friend Fredbear, the thing that soothes him). This also ties back into Immortal and the Restless in a way. A lot of people think the vampire is William and that Clara is his wife, with the baby being Mike, his misfit son, but the show calls Clara a "mistress", or illegitimate love interest, so it's possible that if you think about who Yenndo might be... that Cassidy could be William's illegitimate son (yes, son, TOYSNHK uses he/him and Cassidy is a unisex name). This would explain why Cassidy is TOYSNHK in the first place, but I digress.

I actually like and agree with the idea that he actually possess the plush. I can imagine it being something for Mike to stay determined and focus on his goals.

Scott seems to implement visual story-telling very intentionally; I agree with you that to introduce two visually distinct forms of communication in the work book (altered text & faded text) but for it to be the same character makes no sense; one format then would have been enough (especially because Mike is writing with red ink; having more "types" then character clutters the narrative illogically). I think what we need to ask is; "Why do we need to know he can't see?" from a writing perspective, details only need to exist or truly add to the story if it helps to inform us about something or "sets the mood". In horror many details exist just to be creepy (mention of body fluids, suggestions of feeling trapped or alone), because the story playing with your sensory emotions is central to that genre. With a mystery every detail is either a true hint or a red herring. One easy way to distinguish between them is that if a detail seems to be given but it doesn't immediately cause you to think of something else then it probably is a genuine detail meant to inform you better about the situation. All of that said, what benefit is it to tell us details like "I can't see" unless Scott is directly trying to suggest that information can tell us something? We never wonder if the other ghosts see things; being told that a specific ghost cannot see suggests it is existing under different conditions then all the others.

I still cant tell if fnaf 6 set the BV free or fnaf 3 Happiest day did. Honestly for some reason i feel like he was with Mike at the end though. Because thats where William Michael and Elizabeth are. It feels... More potent that all the family is there in some way. (Ignore Ms CEO afton, obviously. /J)