Why Going Faster-Than-Light Leads to Time Paradoxes

6,588,592
0
2022-04-03に共有
Is faster-than-light (FTL) travel possible? In most discussions of this, we get hung up on the physics of particular ideas, such as wormholes or warp drives. But today, we take a more zoomed out approach that addresses all FTL propulsion - as well as FTL messaging. Because it turns out that they all allow for time travel. Join us today as we explore why this is so and the profound consequences that ensue.

Written & presented by Prof David Kipping. Special thanks to Prof Matt Buckley for fact checking and his great blog article that inspired this video (www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2016/8/25/why-ftl-implies….

→ Support our research: www.coolworldslab.com/support
→ Get Stash! teespring.com/stores/cool-wor...

THANK-YOU to our supporters D. Smith, M. Sloan, C. Bottaccini, D. Daughaday, A. Jones, S. Brownlee, N. Kildal, Z. Star, E. West, T. Zajonc, C. Wolfred, L. Skov, G. Benson, A. De Vaal, M. Elliott, B. Daniluk, M. Forbes, S. Vystoropskyi, S. Lee, Z. Danielson, C. Fitzgerald, C. Souter, M. Gillette, T. Jeffcoat, H. Jensen, J. Rockett, N. Fredrickson, D. Holland, E. Hanway, D. Murphree, S. Hannum, T. Donkin, K. Myers, A. Schoen, K. Dabrowski, J. Black, R. Ramezankhani, J. Armstrong, K. Weber, S. Marks, L. Robinson, F. Van Exter, S. Roulier, B. Smith, P. Masterson, R. Sievers, G. Canterbury, J. Kill, J. Cassese, J. Kruger, S. Way, P. Finch, S. Applegate, L. Watson, T. Wheeler, E. Zahnle, N. Gebben, J. Bergman, E. Dessoi, J. Alexander, C. Macdonald, M. Hedlund, P. Kaup, C. Hays, S. Krasner, W. Evans, J. Curtin, J. Sturm, RAND Corp, T. Kordell, T. Ljungberg & M. Janke.

::References::
► Alcubierre, M., 1994, The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11 L73: arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009013
► Alcubierre & Lobo (2021), Warp drive basics, arxiv.org/abs/2103.05610
► Pfenning, M. & Ford, L., 1997, The unphysical nature of Warp Drive, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 14, 1743: arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9702026
► Finazzi, S., Liberati, S., Barceló, C., 2009, Semiclassical instability of dynamical warp drives, Physical Review D., 79, 124017: arxiv.org/abs/0904.0141
► McMonigal, B., Lewis, G., O'Byrne, P., 2012, Alcubierre warp drive: On the matter of matter, Physical Review D., 85, 064024: arxiv.org/abs/1202.5708
► Everett, A., 1996, Warp drive and causality, Physical Review D, 53, 7365: journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.…
► For a more rigorous breakdown of the axis flipping in Minkowski spacetime, see Chapter 3 of "Special Relativity" by Valerio Faraoni (williamsgj.people.cofc.edu/Minkowski%20Spacetime.p…)

::Music::
Music licensed by SoundStripe.com (SS) [shorturl.at/ptBHI], or via Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), or with permission from the artist
► Hill - An Interesting Retirement [open.spotify.com/album/3S2hu2EP1lYOXHzwEHcclb]
► Joachim Heinrich - Stjärna
► Falls - Life In Binary
► Chris Zabriskie - Cylinder Two
► Chris Zabriskie - Cylinder Five
► Chris Zabriskie - Cylinder Four
► Falls - Ripley
► Caleb Etheridge - Always Dreaming
► Joachim Heinrich - Y
► Indive - Trace Correction

::Film/TV clips used::
► Interstellar (2014) Paramount Pictures
► Contact (1997) Warnes Bros.
► The Imitation Game (2014) The Weinstein Company
► Star Trek: Generations (1994) Paramount Pictures
► Cosmos: Possible Worlds (2020) National Geographic Fox
► Stephen Hawking's Favorite Places (2016) Curiosity Stream
► Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back (1980) 20th Century Fox
► Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993-1999) Paramount Television
► The Day The Earth Stood Still (2008) 20th Century Fox
► Stargate (1994) MGM/UA Distribution Co.
► Star Trek: Beyond (2016) Paramount Pictures
► Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986) Paramount Pictures
► The Expanse (2015-2022) Legendary Television Distribution
► Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987-1994) Paramount Television
► Avengers: Endgame (2019) Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
► Star Trek: Enterprise (2001-2005) Paramount Television
► Back To The Future (1985) Universal Pictures
► Passengers (2016) Sony Pictures Releasing
► The Time Machine (Dreamworks)
► Alien: Covenant (2017) 20th Century Fox
► Star Trek (1966-1969) Paramount Television
► Tenet (2020) Warner Bros. Pictures
► Loki (2021-) Marvel Studios
► Somewhere In Time (1980) Universal Pictures
► The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (2007) Warner Bros. Pictures
► Star Trek: Into Darkness (2013) Paramount Pictures
► Logan (2017) 20th Century Fox
► Star Trek: First Contact (1996) Paramount Pictures

::Subtitles::
► German by Frischholz Christian

::Chapters::
00:00 Introduction
06:52 Space Time Diagrams
12:51 Causality Violations
17:01 Paradoxes in Time
24:28 Outro and Credits

#FasterThanLight #Alcubierre #CoolWorlds

コメント (21)
  • I like to imagine that as soon as we discover FTL and break spacetime, the simulation crashes and the higher beings are annoyed they have another bug to fix
  • @MHGFTW
    I watched the entire video, and I get the sense you broke the rules of your own diagram. You drew two diagonal lines at the start, indicating the speed of light. You set the premise that any line between the time axis and this diagonal line is something moving slower than light (STL). Any line between the diagonal line and the space axis are faster than light (FTL). You then start speculating about FTL transmitters able to send a message instantaneously, meaning horizontally to the right. I'm with you so far. This is where you break every rule that has been set. You draw a line that goes downward. We've not established any reason why a line would do that. Your made up transmitter can only go up to a limit of a horizontal line (instantaneous messaging). These paradoxes start popping up because you've suddenly decided this message is being sent to the past. The FTL transmitter is now a time machine for no reason. Like I said there might be some physics I don't understand. However in the diagram you've been using, there has been zero explanation of why any line would ever go down. The established rules were that lines could only be in the STL or FTL directions. Once you start going downward you break your own rule set.
  • It's very rare and special when someone can explain such a complicated topic in an easy to understand and follow way. Thank you.
  • Does anyone realize how crazy it is that we can even theorize something like this
  • There once was a young lad named Mike. Who could run faster than the speed of light. He took off one day, In a relative way, And returned on the previous night!
  • The greatest explanation so far. I've been trying for months to understand this by reading forums and watching youtube videos. None were able to explain this. I still need to understand it more intuitively instead of through looking at lines, but this definitely opened my eyes. This is by far the best and most simply explained video so far on this. Thank you
  • "It almost seems like a cruel cosmic joke that the universe be arranged such a way that we are able to look out and glimpse its wonders and yet are trapped here by the speed of light." So well said:washhands:
  • @mw2zorzest
    Well, I don't know about time travel, but a fascinating thing to think about is that if you could travel FTL and have a way to look at earth from any distance, you could go far enough away from earth to see the past.
  • What I love here in the commentary is everyone having the freedom to express their thoughts in either direction or in neither direction. Where I stand, the whole thing is a big mind F – – K. I want “want” to believe we can break the Ftl barrier, but any basis for that desire does not include any scientific knowledge or fact at this point in time. But, it’s fun to talk about. Peace.
  • @yapdog
    The universe doesn't care if it makes sense to us.
  • I like how Terry Pratchett said it better than the way Hawking did: Everything that happens, stays happened.
  • Omg this diagram finally explained why and how space and time are connected. Thank you so much. I always thought I understood this concept but I was just repeating info not fully grasping it.
  • Revisting this. Professor, I just saw an article featuring your terrascope idea, featuring you, of course 😊. I was so excited for you
  • @matzefly
    This video is amazing. Thank you for this simple explanation of such complex issues. I have discussed your diagrams with a couple of colleagues last night and we had an amazing time 😊
  • @yufansa
    "The cosmic speed limit, the speed of light is so diminutive compared to a galaxy. It almost seems like a cruel cosmic joke that the universe be arranged in such a way that we are able to look out and glimpse its wonders and yet are trapped here by the speed of light. Fated to only ever peer through the bars of our cosmic prison and dream." -- This is so beautifully spoken...
  • @tayzonday
    The speed of light should really be taught as the speed of causality. The speed of light is an incidental stenographer of the speed of causality.
  • @Alex-dh2cx
    There's a great scifi series on a subreddit where humans are using C+ canons that send projectiles using something akin to "slipspace" to travel faster than light to target, and in universe from the target's perspective they get hit before the canons are even fired.
  • @BenjWarrant
    Thank you Professor, very interesting. I myself think that the only reason we even discuss FTL travel is because SF writers had to 'invent' it in order to write space travel stories. One thing: I believe you pronounced the word albeit as 'al-bite'. Actually albeit is simply a contraction of 'although be it' or 'although it be', and so is correctly pronounced *all-be-it*.