Insane Whistleblower Drama...

I'm an aviation quality control inspector. Keeping you guys safe is my literal purpose in life. That man did not unalive himself halfway through his deposition against Boeing.

The fact you have to beep out 9/11 is crazy to me. YouTube continues to stoke my rage.

People don't just unalive themselves conveniently moments before testifying against a large organization or a public figure. If they don't fully investigate this situation using independent investigators. This is unethical, at best. Especially since the guy told his family if this was to occur, he didn't do it. Boeing will most likely try to settle quietly with the family with a large sum of money to shut them up. I hope the family sticks toward finding justice!

I went to college for aerospace engineering. First day of class was in 2019. The dean of the school told everyone in the program that 80% of the 25% of us that would actually get our degrees would go to work for Boeing building the same model of commercial aircraft that the FAA had just forced them to ground months earlier because two dropped out of the sky in the span of a couple weeks. He then introduced us to two reps from Boeing, who then gave an hour long presentation about why the FAA was wrong to force them to ground poorly built planes

There are a few things that I feel were left out in the video that are important. John Barnett had told his close friend that if he died it was not by suicide. The report filed by police after his death had very little description of the weapon used. Boeing has influence, and people need to be aware.

My Dad used to work for Boeng for like, most of my life. He retired in my mid 20s and told me about the corrupt leadership which is why he got everything together to retire. And now I am stumbling across this video to confirm this, thank you man

Boeing made the airplane in Final Destination 1. And the Boeing Whistleblower, just like a certain Island owner, didn't take himself out.

Boeing employee here, Boeing had massive quality issues causing all of this issues. The problem is these quality issues still exist, MCAS failure and individual blaming is unacceptable, Boeing as a whole, meaning the executives, the investors, need to be held accountable. Stock needs to stay out of manufacturing of my aircraft.

It's disheartening to see these distressing incidents happen, especially with something as serious as aviation. It's clear that companies like Boeing need to prioritize safety over financial gain. It's also crucial that pilots are given the right training for new aircraft systems to prevent disastrous accidents.

I know a machinist that works for Boeing. She said the small company she worked for prior was managed better than Boeing. Like the shops are run down and ppl don't have what they need.

The Concorde was an incredibly safe aircraft, especially compared to the garbage that Boeing is pushing currently. The Concorde explosion you mentioned was caused by runway debris from another plane's tires or something being inhaled into an engine during takeoff. I personally think this would have bought many if not any plane down.

At my engineering school Boeing used to be a joke. We used to say things like “I hope I get an internship or job at being so I can get paid a million bucks for doing absolutely nothing” 😂 How true that sentiment rings today….

Another problem with the 737 MAX was/is the issue that the MAX in the name refers to the fact that all they did was fit bigger, overpowered engines on a regular 737. It made the planes more efficient, but the larger engines also put more stress on the airframe that it wasn't designed for. They basically hot rodded their planes with bigger engines but didn't modify the airframe to handle them, nor the flight systems to compensate for the increased power.

This whistleblower specifically told people that he would never harm himself, and if he was ever found “harmed” that it wasn’t by his own hands. He pointed to Boeing. He knew they were capable of it and he was right 😳

It was wild how fast the medical examiner called it a suicide.

The only Concorde accident wasn't even their fauit. It was because a McDonnell Douglas DC-10 that took off earlier fell apart spontaneously, leaving a piece of metal on the runway that the Concorde ran over. And it happened after McDonnell Douglas merged with Boeing.

‘Truly a sexu@l big chungas in the airline world.’ What a magnificent line.

Least subtle assassination ever

Charlemagne's Clock X Boeing employee started a YouTube channel personally calling out the people responsible for the decrease in quality by name and going through the history of what changed the company. Absolutely worth the watch! He already has 13 videos out on the topic. Perfect for an ADHD deep dive lol Charlemagne's Clock

I work in the GIS/Geography sector. There were other issues with the Concorde as well. The main one being the cruising altitude of 60,000 feet. You're heading into the tropopause and parts of the stratosphere there. On a normal flight around 35,000-37,000 feet you will stay in the troposphere, or the area where we are in now. Because of the low pressure in the tropopause and stratosphere, if there was an event where the pressurization of the cabin was lost there would only be a 10-15 second reaction time for passengers and pilots to grab masks with oxygen while the plane descended to safety. This is not realistic. This was a massive flaw in the design of the past Concorde. However, they are attempting, with United Airlines of all companies, to bring a version of supersonic flight back. This time it would be over the Pacific ocean with flights to Hawaii and east Asia. I am unsure if the altitude and pressurization concerns have been addressed or even if they can be. But that was a massive flaw with the Concorde, as amazing as those videos on YouTube are to watch, that will make high altitude supersonic flight a challenge. Note: It would also depend on how rapid the pressure lost would be. I forgot to mention this. In what I am describing, it would be a near-instantaneous decompression at the cruising altitude of 60,000 feet. With any aircraft (or life in general) it is impossible to work any scenario out. That's why in my work I usually do both extremes and then work out medium ground from there. In this situation I'm talking about the worst-case scenario. It's always best to account and plan for those. Second Note: Where this was flying would be in the middle of the Ozone Layer as the Ozone Layer is located at 15-30 km above Earth's surface and the cruising altitude was at 18.2km. The reason you don't hear much about the Ozone Layer is because we actually took steps to fix it and it worked. In the 1980s we realized that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were tearing the Ozone Layer to pieces. Or at least a huge hole. So we phased them out via the 1987 Montréal Protocol with a full international ban on place in 2010. It basically worked and the Ozone Layer essentially replenished itself (is the long story short version).