[SCRUB] SpaceX Static Fires Ship 30 in Preparation for the Fifth Starship Flight

225,614
0
Published 2024-05-07
NOTE: This is a moving situation. NSF will adjust the start time of the stream as the day goes on, if SpaceX delays testing.

SpaceX is testing Ship 30 on Suborbital Stand B. It is expected that Ship 30 will be part of the fifth integrated flight of Starship. An overpressure notice was delivered to residents.
The road is closed for testing to commence between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. local time. Ship 30 so far has conducted cryogenic proof tests.

24/7 Coverage: nsf.live/starbase

⚑ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. ⚑

πŸ” If you are interested in using footage captured by this stream, please review our content use policy: www.nasaspaceflight.com/content-use-policy/

All Comments (21)
  • @tripp4222
    like watching grass grow thank goodness for you 2 and your commentary good job guys never understood why the media watches pre launch for 8 hrs i think its about 8 hours of static chilling phase then 45 secs of real action
  • @jimchapman9358
    Atlas V is going back to the VIF to replace the valve on the upper stage NASA and ULA is now targeting launch NET May 17th at 6:16 p.m. EDT for the first crewed launch of Boeing's Starliner capsule Calypso
  • @snakevenom4954
    I was not expecting a static fire for ship 30 before IFT-4
  • Hey great to be here just curious what is the difference concerning mission status between Falcon 9 and starship?
  • Hopefully, someday, they launch Starhopper on a booster, and send her into orbit.
  • @johnnylogan22
    I would be willing to bet that a second booster flight would almost have to become a reality within the next four launches, this means a launch a land, a refuel and starship and launch again… Holy shit this stuff is so awesome
  • @beboH4o
    19th of may is the launch right
  • @StevePemberton2
    2:29:30 from what I have read there were more than just two things needed to make the Shuttle fly without pilots. It was a longer list, even for nominal missions. But the real problem according to NASA studies was that if anything off-nominal occurred during a mission with no pilots on board the Shuttles would be lost. So extensive modifications would be needed including enabling some remote commands from the ground to enable the Shuttle to handle at least some types of off-nominal situations. There is a NASA document titled "Autonomous Space Shuttle" by Jeffrey Siders and Robert Smith, they estimated that the cost to do the conversion would be in the "low billions" and they would still probably lose some Shuttles because even with modifications it wouldn't be able to handle every off-nominal situation.
  • @MrJPI
    O my!! Fuel transfer is easy on Earth, it's been done all the time! So you don't learn anything testing transfer from Starship to Starship because then both Starships function as tanks on Earth.
  • @JGG3345
    Lets hope space X works better than X/Twitter.
  • @zapfanzapfan
    I think the horse box is filled with doughnuts 🍩
  • @user-ot7nt9tb2q
    The ship is really a space truck, meant to ferry parts into space to build space stations. To build a galaxy class, star ships .that's the best vision for humanity.