How to outsmart the Prisoner’s Dilemma - Lucas Husted
4,578,965
Published 2020-08-27
--
Two perfectly rational gingerbread men, Crispy and Chewy, are out strolling when they’re caught by a fox. Instead of simply eating them, he decides to put their friendship to the test with a cruel dilemma. He’ll ask each gingerbread man whether he’d opt to Spare or Sacrifice the other. What should they choose? Lucas Husted dives into the classic game theory scenario: the Prisoner's Dilemma.
Lesson by Lucas Husted, directed by Ivana Bošnjack and Thomas Johnson.
Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/TEDEdNewsletter
Support us on Patreon: bit.ly/TEDEdPatreon
Follow us on Facebook: bit.ly/TEDEdFacebook
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/TEDEdTwitter
Peep us on Instagram: bit.ly/TEDEdInstagram
View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/how-to-outsmart-the-prisoner-s-…
Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! John Hong, Minh Tran, Helen Lee, Anthony Benedict, Turine Tran, Mathew Samuel, Karthik Balsubramanian, Lee, Livia-Alexandra Sarban, Annastasshia Ames, João Henrique Rodrigues, Sebastiaan Hols, Aries SW, SANG HAN, Amy Lopez, ReuniteKorea, Vinh-Thuy Nguyen, Liz Candee, Clovis Norroy, Danielle Downs, Nik Maier, Angel Pantoja, Nishant Suneja, 张晓雨, Srinivasa C Pasumarthi, Kathryn Vacha, Anthony Arcis, Jeffrey Segrest, Sandra Fuller Bocko, Alex Pierce, Lawrence Teh Swee Kiang, BRENDAN NEALE, Jane White, Karmi Nguyen, John C. Vesey, Yelena Baykova, Harshita Jagdish Sahijwani, Won Jang, Nick Johnson, Tariq Keblaoui, Carlos H. Costa, Eimann P. Evarola, Aleksandr Lyozin, Mohamed Elsayed, Alan Wilder, Marcus Appelbaum, Francisco Leos, Kevin O'Leary, Les Howard and Ten Cha.
All Comments (21)
-
"Two perfectly rational gingerbread men" As gingerbread men usually are
-
Why isn’t that wizard minding his own business? Typical wizard.
-
"Infinite triple limb consumption" is not a phrase I had expected to ever hear in my life, but I am not disappointed
-
if the gingerbread men were actually smart they would have just offered to let the fox eat their gingerbread house
-
“The weather today is partly suspicious, with chances of betrayal.” wow who hurt you
-
Plot Twist : The Fox Was Disguised As The Wizard, To Eat them Everyday!
-
"Their eternity may be very crumby but so long as they go out on a limb their lives will never be half baked." well done guys. Got three puns in at the final few seconds of the video. Bravo
-
I like stuff like this because its a convincing argument you can make to even a sociopath that morality is a logical thing.
-
God, the animation is phenomenal, shout out to the animators : Ivana bosnjak and Thomas Johnson
-
Moral of the story: Don’t look happy when you encounter a fox.
-
The flaw in the rationality is that while crispy looses nothing of his own, he does lose something very valuable: a friend
-
At that point I'd just say "well, if he's going to eat one or part of us anyway. New plan: Kill the fox or die trying." I'd say YOLO, but it wouldn't apply here.
-
alternate ending: the fox dies because he ate too much sugar.
-
When you realise that the wizard is just trying to feed his pet fox. Being a freelance wizard is a low income job after all.
-
Fox: So have you decided? Fox: Who will be sacrificed and who will be spared? Chewy & Crispy: (in unison) Yes we have decided to sacrifice the WIZARD!!!
-
Oh, so THAT'S how you outsmart the Prisoners' Dilemma... by just changing the premise so it's literally not the Prisoners' Dilemma anymore.
-
Of course the gingerbread people are perfectly rational, everyone in the Ted Ed universe is
-
the cookies: 😀😀 the fox: yall a lil too happy so imma test y’all the cookies: 😐😐
-
“ Fox, we have come to bargain ...” “ You have come to have your limbs eaten “
-
This video is a great way to show explain all of these concepts. My only qualm is that I don't think Chewy and Crispy friendship is represented by the problem which is fine for the video but it would of been fun to talk about. If my friend was going to lose 3 or all of his limbs I would probably value those at least a little bit. The simple graph assumes that Chewy and Crispy are opposing players in a game and not working against the fox on a team with limited communication. I would have to assume that two real friends would draw the graph out based on the total number of limbs between the two of them rather than the number of limbs individually and therefore always pick Spare from the get go.
