Nassim Haramein

Published 2014-07-06

All Comments (18)
  • @brandonm3649
    it would be awesome if you did a live FaceTime chat with nassim so he can enlighten you
  • @monkerud2108
    The algeba doesnt matter if you fine tune it. The form of the equation and normalization is everything, newtons constant had to be Measured for the equations to make sence.
  • @JC-ql3lx
    I think there's something to his theories but where I think he's most wrong is that he assumes the sacred geometry is stating that when the feminine and masculine are equal, we advance...and that this is the message hidden in the 64 tetrahedron grid. I think he's almost right but that it is not a message. It's a warning.
  • +Chris Williams Interesting that you set your comments in such a way that I cannot directly reply to them. I already been through the "You don't have math but he does point." It doesn't matter. Math can describe any logically possible reality and there is an infinite variety of such. So Haramein has to prove that that what he does correlates to reality. You already express that he does this but your either ignorant or delusional. The universe does not contain 1000 trillion trillion universes worth of energy in 1 cm cubed. Protons do not weigh what he says they do. Neutrons do exist and the chart you said that I made with no basis was a reproduction of Haramein's chart. You really just owned yourself by not paying attention. Haramein's chart was about how all the structures of the universe from the proton to the galaxy have the same density. I was pointing out how that is not true and how Harmein's chart would have to fabricated to make it appear as such. And you could have gotten all this if you just watched the video... You're defending your favorite person just like an irrational fanboy would.
  • Nu*clear* Not "nuclear"! Anyway... Reasonably decent refutation.
  • Well math is the way all scientists prove there opinion. Your assuming that the scientists that read his paper aren't competent enough to catch that. Really?
  • @TruthSurge
    man... I am so UFO-couldn't-give-a-shit.  :(   Sorry, mon.
  • You should go back and check out Master Nassim Haramein's video's I think you must have missed some thing....
  • @infinitedaves
    kind of disappointed that this is the only debunk vid i've found on Nassim... most of this is video uses ad hominem attacks to discredit him, with a few uncited references in between. For future debunk videos I would suggest citing sources to make your argument more credible, and not using ad hominem attacks as they only invoke anger in the comment sections and provide nothing to the debunking. I'm not saying I believe Haramein's ideas at all, but attacks like this only discourage thinking outside the box, and if nobody is willing to stray from the norm there would be no progress. It is perfectly fine to be skeptical, but don't let that close you off from other possibilities because sometimes wrong ideas can eventually lead to correct ones by asking new questions.
  • @bvgftr2
    glad someone besides is sick of that flower of life.....
  • @phoenixhonka883
    geez. better take this down. Nassim's work is peer reviewed, dude. And you are?
  • @Barbitone
    Hi Atheist Paladin. Wow, you really know your stuff. That was great - I'd hate to see Nassim have to try to come up with a better argument then yours! lol lol He is a stupid. I cant believe he thinks these things, he obviously isn't on your level! haha... Chow.
  • You draw charts with no math foundation. its not his opinion. Its math. He has accurate to back him up while you do not present a strong case.
  • The problem really is that what they have been doing in physics doesn't match reality.