ICJ reaffirms Israeli occupation as illegal, calls for global compliance : Barghouti
23,962
Published 2024-07-19
Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Follow us on Twitter twitter.com/AJEnglish
Find us on Facebook www.facebook.com/aljazeera
Check our website: www.aljazeera.com/
Check out our Instagram page: www.instagram.com/aljazeeraenglish/
Download AJE Mobile App: aje.io/AJEMobile
#InternationalCourtOfJustice #IsraelOccupation #GenevaConvention #OccupiedTerritories #IllegalSettlements #ICJResolution #HumanRights #InternationalLaw
All Comments (21)
-
You cannot ask Palestinians to stop resisting Israeli’s illegal and inhumane occupation of Palestinian territory when the illegal occupation is still there in Palestine 🇵🇸
-
Exactly....israel is a structure....not a country!!!!!
-
Before 1948 where's Israel?
-
ICJ should be able to stop Israel from Occupation. Not advising.
-
ICJ opinion is not secret but known to everyone arround the world before the ICJ
-
Free Palistine
-
What about the ongoing South African case against Pissrael? Are we supposed to just forget about that?
-
Great response to every question
-
Koliko je krvi proliveno na zemlji Gazi a niko nije reagovao od ovih pametnjakovica.sto primaju platu za nista
-
B D S
-
Great input by Mustafa Barghouti!
-
Israel became the new SNL!
-
International law does not have to be used...It has to be enforced...Otherwise it means nothing..
-
Thank you mr Barghouti and God bless you and bless us all as Palestinian
-
ICJ is meaningless. Any court is meaningless when it's judgement can be ignored by a "guilty" party that considers the court to be biased against it. With the one exception of a resolution in 1948, declaring that a piece of territory controlled by Britain, which didn't want to control it, should be shared between two ethnic groups living there, there has not been a single UN decision in any matter involving Israel that Israel considered fair. I won't waste time giving examples. If Palestinians expect to have their demands satisfied by getting international bodies to make judgements, they have an extraordinary inability to learn from past experience. I am just barely old enough to have had the ability to understand some things when that first UN resolution happened, in 1947. And a year before that, another major conflict between Britain and a group it governed, the people of India, was settled when the Indian spiritual leader Mohandas Gandhi let a non-violent protest, shaming the British to give India its freedom. I remember the adults in my community, still in shock from the second world war, excited by this "new way" to settle conflicts without war. I also remember that India, at that time, was populated by two religious factions, Hindu and Muslim, which wanted separation from one another, by dividing the new India into two countries. Of course I didn't know, at that time, that those two countries would be constantly threatening one another for the rest of my life. But the situation in the "Holy land" in 1947 seemed very similar to the situation in India, and it was the Palestinians who apparently saw no reason to try the Gandhi approach at all.
-
How long has this been going on? These were declared illegal some time ago ...
-
see US supreme court. That is what they call, integrity.
-
Would they listen to the law?
-
☝️
-
Netanyahu is visiting USA. who will take care about this conflict in his absence