CIVIL WAR (2024) BREAKDOWN: Ending Explained & Details You Missed

Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days! Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/rngeq9ob

I think they paired Texas with California so it didn't become a red vs blue topic for the film.

it doesnt tell you the backgrounds of the sides and factions because they dont want you "rooting" for one faction. they want you to feel like the journalist who has to be neutral throughout the situation

what made the movie great was that it didnt pick a side... it showed war is hell and no one wins

It was scary intense that the soldiers had a kill without mercy mindset

I liked that the cause of the civil war was not explained. The point is that there is a civil war.

I think one of the quotes you captured from the film sums it up, "We record so other people ask."

Regarding context… I think he wanted us to focus on the outcome, not the smoking gun.

I'm bummed out they didn't give Nick Offerman more screen time

I dont think Cali and Texas are aligning together to form any sort of union.They are both seceding at the same time and are the only two states who would be able to their local military bases. teaming up against the feds as a marriage of convenience.

Jesse Clemons delivered a performance of the life time. One of the best scenes I’ve sene this year.

I watched it on IMAX. WOW. So... I have to say as a veteran and a photographer, this is a motion picture about photographers covering highly dangerous situations. As a veteran I can say that the script, and cinematography was outstanding. This flick had me remembering things I didn't really want to remember and was highly convincing as far as effects go. All in all this movie was vary thought provoking. The fact that a civil war was exploding everywhere was a prop. The story is all about capturing history and trying to not get yourself killed, or becoming the center of the action. Good flick. Once is enough for me. The Sony Alpha 7 was a nice touch too. Thanks for posting.

I found it weird that Joel was really upset when Sammy was killed, but, at the start of the film when Lee told Jessie to wear a helmet and everyone was ok when, helmetless, Lee, was shot.

They don't tell you the whole story because a lot of the times journalists don't know the whole story

California and Texas aligning isn't to big a stretch considering that it's mentioned that Offermans character forced himself into a third term. I think it was a "the enemy of my end is my friend" type of alliance.

I would argue that “antifa massacre” is also vague. Because everyone keeps interpreting that as Antifa getting massacred, but it’s said so open ended that it could also mean that Antifa was doing the massacring…

The Hawaiian shirts represent a sect of doomsday preppers known as Bugaloo Boys. They are called that because they are waiting for Civil War 2: Electric Bugaloo. I know this sounds funny and I am posting this from a comedy page profile, but I assure you that is the case.

I do think there is validity to being vague as to whom started/why it started. It shows the nature of war, that indeed, it would be a crap shoot to run into anyone with an agenda.

I understand the lack of context can be frustrating, but we're meant to focus on the journalists and what their thoughs and motivations are. And NOT doing a big exposition dump or telling us every detail helps keep the focus where it should be. Very intense film, but a very good film

i saw this movie yesterday . im glad they left things without background because why would the people who lived it for years most likely talk about the hard things and this was about the photo evidence not the written word so pictures are worth more in this context. but all around loved it