Jordan Peterson - An Antidote to Facts & Science
9,523
Publicado 2021-04-20
Timestamps:
0:00 – Introduction
1:34 – Convoluted Language (Citations from “12 Rules for Life”, Peterson’s failure to answer questions)
05:40 – Missing Definitions (Debate with Sam Harris, Interview with Cathy Newman, Postmodern Neo-Marxists)
14:24 – Misrepresentation of History & Science (Peterson’s failure to get “Postmodernism” right, Debate with Žižek, Nazi revisionism, Red Skull-incident, Climate denialism)
28:17 – Neglection of Academic Standards (Sloppy references in “12 Rules for Life”, Anti-Science)
33:14 – Conclusion
Cuck Philosophy on Stephen Hicks: • A Critique of Stephen Hicks' "Explain...
Three Arrows on “Cultural Marxism”: • How "Cultural Marxism" became the Far...
Cass Eris on Peterson: • Fix Your Posture to Get Lobster Babes...
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/IVDareios
Full list of References: www.mediafire.com/file/lqvy2smoyk1c8l3/References+…
Music: The Curse of Monkey Island – Official Soundtrack: www.zeitgestalten.org/comi.html
Todos los comentarios (21)
-
Monkey Island music? "1985 Animal Crossing" lol
-
I have trouble with the point you make at 23:50. 100% of the proceeds from the hail lobster merch went to charity. One of the charities was for helping underprivileged kids, and the other was a donation in partnership with a company that makes off-road wheelchairs for disabled people. They didn’t really advertise the hail lobster stuff as “charity merch,” so I don’t think anyone would blame you thinking they were doing it for profit. As a German and, consequently, someone who is more sensitive to references of Nazism, I kinda understand how you could interpret the hail lobster merch as an endorsement/subtle endorsement of the Nazi ideology. But I think that the point of the merch was to make fun of the comparison between Jordan Peterson and nazism. Whether that comparison holds any water is a different subject, which you tackle throughout your video (and as a JP fan myself, I obviously have my own opinions on that).
-
Sir finding your videos is one of the nicest surprises
-
Great video. Just a pet peeve of mine, if you're telling us to go watch a video by someone else (Cass Eris in this case), don't make us download a pdf to find the link. Just put the link in the description or a card.
-
Where can I find the debate with Žižek?
-
hands down the best video on Peterson that I've seen in my life.
-
You should have more material.. Recent rogen interview was bonkers 😅
-
my favourite thing about Peterson is how angry he gets in his hypothetical scenarios
-
logic and reason can explain everything now here's a 20 minute rant about dragons
-
I wonder what you would make of Bernardo Kastrup. I find him to be interesting with a sympathetic way of arguing his position, even if I’m not yet sold on metaphysical idealism. He also has a good takedown of Sam Harris and his pseudo-philosophy
-
Your channel gives the same vibe as kraut's earlier videos. Is german really the most technical language tho, just kidding you are doing great. And your impersonation idk if it's the right word is really fine.
-
Wow…. Major Heater….
-
You did well to isolate and describe Jordan Peterson’s rhetorical techniques, and to note the irony of his unlearned polemics against his presumed intellectual enemies (how he unwittingly comes to resemble, out of sheer ignorance and hubris, what he most abhors: a postmodernist); but you made little contribution to the important task of exposing and analyzing his “ideology,” which lies largely concealed behind all of his relativistic and foggy obfuscations, his myriad and confounding performances of “strategic ambiguity.” Perhaps you have decided to reserve such an analysis for the second part in your series; nevertheless, you could have done more with the opportunities you admirably created for yourself.
-
Vielen Dank für das erstellen eines Kanals mit interessanten content, by the way, Sau komisch an manchen Stellen
-
I hate watching Peterson interviews, because he's allergic to giving straight answers.
-
I think “postmodern Marxism” is supposed to be a contradiction. It speaks to the inconsistencies I see in the ideas of the people he’s trying to describe. Now don’t get me wrong, that trait isn’t unique to them. Most (if not all) people hold conflicting views. But if someone is skeptical of the current narrative, then decides to dismantle or alter it in favor of a self proclaimed Marxist narrative; what would you call that?
-
Some really good stuff here. I've linked it to the reddit page of enoughjordanpetersonspam quality like this needs more subs mate
-
Peterson’s truth is a right and wrong on how to be psychologically healthy. It draws from existentialism. I enjoy the thought experiment.
-
Nice job. If i could ask - do one on Stefan Molyneux, he s pretty much the most open guy in the alt right and the one that shows the most what they are about when they agree, sympathize or don t challenge his thoughts. I know he dosen t need debunking but u could show a compilation of him saying insane stuff around the others
-
Brett Weinstein please