CNN anchor describes Stormy Daniels' demeanor inside courtroom

OMG I wished THIs whole thing would be televised.

Stormy describes Von Shizinpantz perfectly. 🍄

And meantime he gets an indefinite pass from judge Cannon. You couldn’t make this amount of legal corruption up! Really!

Melania Trump to Divorce Attorneys.., "Stand Back & Stand By" 😂😅😆

There's no way they've been sleeping in the same room.The Man been tweeting all night.

If Melania doesn’t stand with trump why should America?

The Cross-examination of Stormy saying that she Hates him, that she'd dance if he's convicted, etc., in no way "attacks her credibility." She isn't suing him, she isn't being paid like what "Experts" charge for their testimony. I Hates him and I will dance too. He should have been prosecuted and Incarcerated 30 years ago, and everyone knows that even his "supporters."

Defense really screwed up by not knowing the answers to their own questions.

Are all those Christian ministers that endorse Trump paying attention to Stormy’s testimony? Like do they even care?

She giggled, Donny cried, and the whole world is laughing. 🤣

As Richard Nixon found out, the crime is the cover-up, not the action.

It's about the financial records, not about the sex. All these are just mud slinging.

Was Jared Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump in the courtroom? His sons? His wife Melania Trump?:eyes-purple-crying:

These Van Gogh court images are great!

Calm before the Stormy

> I don't like presidents who don't get re-elected. < Obama: I did get re-elected! 😆 Bush: Me too! 😁 Clinton: Me too! 😝 Trump: blowing air from his nostrils, embarassed and angry 😡🤬

Dears, Stormy Daniels is the only person Trump ever hired... who was actually qualified for the job.

Its understandable why they went into detail. I remember for example once a witness described a mole on the perpetrator's penis to prove she wasn't making up the claim. When you have someone that "normal people", might think is unscrupulous, simply making a claim that allows them to add their own bias cuts against the original claim. Noone wants salacious sexual details, but the defendant claims there never was a sexual encounter and that becomes his angle for claiming extortion. The only way for the Prosecution to cut that strategy off is to make sure everyone in that room knows for certain there absolutely was a legitimate sexual encounter and not simply dirty pictures and blackmail like you see in the movies. In all honesty, I would have had her describe his physical features to prove she saw him with limited or no clothes. How else can the defendant be seen as lying if he is?

According to Stormy's testimony, this case should have been heard in small claims court.

I believe Stormy. Enough of these reporters telling us what to believe.