The 5 Laws of Human Stupidity That You Must Know!

9,314
0
2024-01-17に共有
Learn about the 5 basic laws of human stupidity according to renowned historian Carlo M. Cipolla. With examples from history, discover the logic (or lack thereof) behind human foolishness. From the rise of Nazi Germany to everyday life, these laws will change the way you think about stupidity forever.

TAKE CARE OF YOUR SELF!
Mental Health Journal: amzn.to/3w6ONH4
Unf**k Your Brain: amzn.to/3w32gQe
Anxie-T Supplements: amzn.to/4dchT8s
Goodbye Stress Gummy: amzn.to/4b4ILW5
Workbook for Managing Depression and Anxiety: amzn.to/3UxI2Yo
Focus Brain Supplement (Memory and Clarity Boost): amzn.to/3xFWCUr

TAKE CARE OF YOUR CHILDREN!
Game of the Year Award Winner! 60000+ Solutions STEM Puzzle Game!
amzn.to/4dnzn27
Organic Kids Brain Supplements for Memory and Focus:
amzn.to/3JC3PYh
The Whole-Brain Child (Nurture Your Child's Developing Mind):
amzn.to/3JyY5Pf
Fidget Dodecagon 12-Side Cube For Stress Relieve, Anxiety And Anti Depression for Children
amzn.to/3xOOEsk
Speech Therapy for Toddlers
amzn.to/44b8RVb


SUBSCRIBE:    / @mrbrain122  
==============================================================

#stupid #humanbehavior #humanstupidity

コメント (21)
  • Cipolla is pretty good, but rather ignores other factors such as desperation and fear. Perfectly rational and sensible people can still spout stupid nonsense if pressed to it - think about North Korea, where it's basically a survival strategy. Similarly, if that's 'the way the wind's blowing' a lot of people will opt for the safer path of going along with it. Imagine if everyone is starving, your kids are starving, and the guy in charge of the food supply says: "Your family can have food, but your neighbour's can't." How long are you going to stay on that moral high ground? He also seems to ignore the power of media and propaganda, pushing a one-sided view of the 'Nation' (and the World) from the moment we learn to read. I'm not just talking about Autocracies here, perfectly liberal-seeming Democracies do it just as much. The main purpose is to make you always think you're in the minority if you question anything about the powers-that-be.
  • Today México is a good example of why we should limit stupidity and why stupid people are more dangerous than bandits
  • @salec7592
    The fifth law postulates that the Pillagers are somehow restrained in their damage dealing by the extent of the personal benefit they can extract from their wrongdoing. However, criminal psychology data does not support that premise. "Some people just like to watch the world burning". Criminals are often like that.
  • @WEKSr
    "Stupidity" is a poor choice of words for these folks.... but I don't think English already has a better word, and so propose the following new and special purpose past tense of "to think...." "THUNK." That word seems to sound just right to describe people who fit into this category ... People who believe that they have already thought things out, and are unwilling to hear anything not supporting their views...
  • @4Beats4Me
    So then do not the nonstupid among us qualify as stupid for lack of insight?
  • The "Second Law of Stupidity" is largely inconsistent with Group 4. They neither benefit themselves or others. Thus a successful "stupid" person illustrates that they are capable of looking out for "their best interest", the longer their success goes on. If "Stupid people" is a description of Group 4, the people who have benefitted themselves cannot be "Stupid". So there appears to be a little false specificity here. Not that I don't agree in part with #2. But also the rhetoric seems to imply what I find to be a false dichotomy--a false _binary_, if you will, that you are either in a class of "Stupid people" or you are not. For example if "stupid people" cause "great harm", maybe that's because the people in power acted stupidity, as reviewed by the people out of power that didn't have the opportunity to illustrate their own alternate stupidity. So, I wouldn't put too much in these "laws". Besides Marxism is WAY stupid, and "their own best interest" sounds like Marxist and quasi-Marxist jargon, enough to speculate what it means when someone things "their own best interest" is a self-evident thing (which does not mean that it is not at times self-evident).
  • @WEKSr
    " is a poor choice of words for these folks.... but I don't think English already has a better word, and so propose the following new and special purpose past tense of "to think...." "THUNK." That word seems to sound just right to describe people who fit into this category ... People who believe that they have already thought things out, and are unwilling to hear anything not supporting their views...
  • Okay, you officially lose me at 8:49, how can we trust that "rational people" have "strength in numbers" if #3 is "Always and Inevitably, Everyone Underestimates the Number of Stupid Individuals In Circulation". Doesn't expecting "strength in numbers" sound like a good way to trust that you're not underestimating the number of "stupid people"? This just sounds to me like a modern, secular pretention at separating the "sheep from the goats". And it's false rigor bothers me.
  • Unfortunately this is The trend in Angola. A ticking timebomb in an already rock-bottomed society.
  • @dearbrad1996
    You think back about so many movements motivated by good intentions. The world is in such a mess because of good intentions. Sure, good things happen but it's two steps forward, one step back.
  • @HHHGeorge
    Cipolla's Five Laws of Human Stupidity describes precisely some of the idiots we have today. For instance the cancel culture and the radical green movements. This video should be broadcast in every country in the world to wake the non-stupid people to the damage stupid people are doing to their countries.
  • @grendlsma
    All the MAGAs in the comments trying desperately to pretend this isn't about them......too funny.
  • @mattc5154
    I guess you're a Wackadoo or Wackadon't regardless of Country or Religion.